• Niyom Suwandej Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok


The goal of this research was to study about quality management format across sub-district administrative organization by interview using structured in-depth questionnaires format as a tool for collecting data from executives and other managers in total of 125 people. The sample groups were specifically chosen from 10 of Khaerai Sub-district Administration Organization. Data were analyzed by using score from the questionnaires and findings a percentage of full score. The result showed the essential element of a concept idea in Quality management Format across the organization of Sub-District administrative Organization namely 1) Leadership: 100 percent of executives and managers who had a good score in behavior or leading role affected to the organization. Leader had to know how   to make idealistic and creative decision with a clear objective. A good leader had to work justly and be responsible when providing service and devote to the public that affect the whole society. 2) Training, 97.6 percent showed that there should be a training at least once a month. 92 percent gained more knowledge and understanding in particular topic from the training. 93.6 percent showed that the best and suitable training for organization was with tools or personal direct training emphasized on WALK Rally model and learning from the real situations. 3) Structure:  there should have the direct command that supported service people. The practical organization should have to provide individual for the right job with effective communication. 4) Communication: Crucial to organization and service. That drove the management forward and acted as a tool to future success. 5) Rewarding: 100 percent result showed that there should be rewarding criterion or request for employees who showed diligence, endurance, and responsibility to one’s duty 6) Evaluation process affected 96 percent of the service and organization development in improving working potential of the organization In conclusion, executives and manager of Khaerai Sub-district Administration Organization commented and proposed on the 6 main element of Quality management Format across Sub-District Administrative Organization have the highest score in the questionnaire.

Author Biography

Niyom Suwandej, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok

Doctor of Philosophy (Innovation Management), Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

Lecturer in College of innovation management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand

Research interests: management, innovation management, human research management


Baimyrzaeva, M. (2012). Institutional reforms in the public sector: What did we learn? Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Pub Ltd.

Borins, S. (2002). New public management, North American style. In K. Mclaughlin, S. P. Osborne, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), New public management: Current trends and future prospects. New York, NY: Routledge.

Cheyjanya,P, (1998). Key concepts in communication. Bangkok; Yellow Printing.

Haque, S. M. (2007). Theory and practice of public administration in Southeast Asia: Traditions, directions, and impacts. International Journal of Public Administration, 30: 1297-1326.

Jerasopon, P. (1992). Communication theory. Lecture of main subject and communication theory. Sukhothai Thammathirat University

Mongkol, K. (2012). Globalizing new public management: A pilot study from Thailand. Research Journal of Business Management, 6(1), 19-29.

Naranan,C. & Trakulsa, P. (2013). Administration of sub-district administrative organization Thaloung sib-district, Muang district Phichit province. Thesis Master of Public Administration, major public policy, Naresuan University.

Painter, M. (2006). Thaksinisation or managerialism? Reforming the Thai bureaucracy. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 36(1), 26-47.

Phumdara, T. (2018). Public Participation in the Local Development Plan of Phromphiram Sub-District, Phromphiram District, Phitsanulok Province.

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform a comparative analysis: New public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Satorn, P. (2010). Education administration. Bangkok: Khurusapha Printing.

Suwandej, N. (2015). Factors Influencing Total Quality Management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2215-2222

Tanaporn, C, & Sadudee, M, (2000). The management participation in environment management to contribute learning in school for opportunity expansion. Phitsanulok Primary Education Service Area Officer 3. Master of Education Program in Curriculum and Instruction, Burapha University.
How to Cite
Suwandej, N. (2019). FACTORS AFFECTING QUALITY MANAGEMENT THROUGHOUT THE ORGANIZATION OF THE SUB-DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION. The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, (4(17), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.35678/2539-5645.4(17).2019.79-90