THE IMPACT OF 360 DEGREES PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS ON EMPLOYEE RETENTION

  • Samar Abboud Milaha Ltd, Doha
Keywords: performance appraisal system, job satisfaction, employee turnover, employee retention, organizational performance

Abstract

The performance assessment is an annual examination of the performance of all workers to enhance the operations of the company and maintain an internal, pleasant climate. The quality of employee performance is judged primarily. William said performance evaluations also contribute to the preparation of a career plan for every junior and senior workers. It is regarded as a tool to enhance the performance of workers via further coaching and training. It attempts to identify individual deficiencies and carry out the training required to increase productivity and optimize each employee's capabilities. The purpose of this study is to investigate the links between performance assessments and work satisfaction in the Lebanese banking industry. This study also focuses on the issues of the Lebanese banking sector's high turnover rates. The study will also evaluate the significance and importance of human resources in the banking industry in the retention of employee skills. Furthermore, in adopting methods of retention of workers in the Lebanese Banking sector the Human Resources department plays a significant role.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Samar Abboud, Milaha Ltd, Doha

DBA (Beirut Arab University, Lebanon)

Senior administrator, Facility management, Milaha Ltd, Doha, Qatar  

Research Interests: Management, Human Resources, Strategic Management

References

Brewster, C., Carey, L., Dowling, P., Globler, P. & Wärnich, S. (2003). Contemporary issues in human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. Oxford University Press, Cape Town.

Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods. Oxford Press, Oxford.

Curwin, J. & Slater, R. (2002). Quantitative methods for business decisions. British Library Cataloguing Data, London.

Drakes, S. (2008). Everybody counts. Black Enterprise, 38(1), 58–59.

Drew, G. (2009). A 360-degree view for individual leadership development, Journal of Management Development, 28(7), 581–592.

Fleenor, J.W. & Prince, J.M. (2016). Using 360-degree feedback in organizations. International Journal of Research in Management and Technology, 6(1), 45–51.

Fourie, D. (2008). An examination of an incentive system to maximize performance in an automobile manufacturing environment. Rhodes University, Grahamstown.

Gallagher, T. (2008). 360-degree performance reviews offer valuable perspectives. Financial Executive, 24, 38(1)

Juselius, K. (2006). The co-integrated VAR model: Methodology and application, Advanced texts in econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Kaur, S. (2013). 360-degree performance Appraisa-Benefits and shortcomings. International Journal of Emerging Research in Management and Technology, 2(6), 83–88.

Kiger, P.J. (2006). When people practices damage market value. Workforce Management, 26(1), 42–55.

Klein, N. (2012). Real wage, labour productivity, and employment trends in South Africa, A closer look, IMF WP/12/92, IMF, Washington, DC.

Calcutta, O. (2011). Should academic institutions in Nigeria use the 360 degree feedback system for employee appraisal. European Journal of Business Management, 3(5), 69–71.

Parry, T. & Lacey, P. (2000). Promoting productivity and workforce effectiveness, Financial Executive, 16(6), 51–53.

Peacock, T. (2007). Advantages and disadvantages of 360-degree feedback, Available online: ehow.com

Peiperl, M.A. (2001). Best practice: Getting 360-degree feedback right. Harvard Business Review, January, 142–147.


Abstract views: 572
PDF Downloads: 415
Published
2021-05-31
How to Cite
Abboud, S. (2021). THE IMPACT OF 360 DEGREES PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS ON EMPLOYEE RETENTION. The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, (3(28), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.35678/2539-5645.3(28).2021.37-49