BUSINESS DIGITALIZATION AS A FACTOR OF GOVERNANCE MODERNIZATION
The study takes a new paradigm of state business regulation, based on the synchronization of interests of business, state and society, on the defining the principles of Government participation in the global economic processes. As a tool for business consolidation, improving the efficiency of state regulation, the formation of e-government was considered. The paper characterizes the e-government as a new form of state regulation of economy. The factors of effective e-government implementation strategy were analyzed. The experience of digitalization of governmental functions of modern states, the rates of asynchrony of development of electronic government in the world, relating with the economic efficiency of modern states, were considered.
Bellamy, C. (2002). From automation to knowledge management: modernizing British government with ICTs. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Vol. 68. № 1.
Bogdanovskaya, I. (2004). E-governance. Social sciences and modernity, № 6.
Camp, J., Chien, Y.T. (2000). The Internet as Public Space: Concepts, Issues, and Implications in Public Policy. Computers and Society. № 4.
Chadwick, A., May, C. (2003). Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. Vol. 16. № 2.
Dunleavy, P., Margetta, H., Bastow, S., Tinkler, J. (2005). New Public Management is Dead – Long Live Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Vol. 16. № 3.
Elyakov, A. (2004). Informational type of social inequity. Social researches, № 8.
Hajer, M., Wagenaar, H. (2003). Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hou ,Y., Moynihan, D. (2007). The Case for Countercyclical Fiscal Capacity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Vol. 17. № 2.
Howlett, M., Rayner, J. (2006). Globalization and Governance Capacity: Explaning Divergence in National Forest Programs as Instances of “Next-Generation” Regulation in Canada and Europe. Governance. Vol. 19. № 2.
Ingraham, P. (2005). Performance: Promises to Keep and Miles to Go. Public Administration Review. Vol. 65. № 4.
Ivanov, D. (2004). The society as a virtual reality. Moscow: АSТ.
Jaeger, P. (2005). Deliberative democracy and the conceptual foundations of electronic government. Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 22. № 3.
Kjaer, A. (2004). Governance (Key Concepts). Cambridge, UK, Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Lenihan, D. (2002). E-Government, Federalism, and Democracy: The New Governance. Ottawa: The Centre for Collaborative Government.
Matilla, J. (2003). Participatory e- Governance – A new solutions to an old problem? In: Salminan, A. (2003). Governing Networks. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
McDermott, K. (2006). Incentives, Capacity, and Implementation: Evidence from Massachusetts Education Reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Vol. 16. № 1.
Moshkin, I. (2006). The e-business evolution: categorical analyses. Economic herald of Rostov State University, № 3.
Pierre, J., Peters, G. (2000). Governance, Politics and the State. Political Analysis. N.Y.: St. Martin’s Press.
Shimko, P. (2004). The optimal regulating of economic systems. Saint-Petersburg: Business-press.
Tiihonen, S. (2004). From Governing to Governance. A process of change. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Vainstein, G. (2002). From new technologies to the new economy. International economy and international relationships (MEIMO) journal, №10.
Abstract views: 231 PDF Downloads: 174
International College Suan Sunandha
Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand